On Film Options and Docudramas

By Debbie Smith

Filmmakers need to remember that the average victim has no background or experience in film or any media for that matter. When a victim is first approached about being involved with a movie or documentary, they can be overwhelmed with it all. When we were first approached, we were very reluctant to be involved, as I was conflicted with the notion of being paid for a film about my victimization. It was explained to me, though, in such a way that I could understand a little better about how my victimization experience could benefit others. What was not explained and should have been made clear, was that this whole process could take years, from the time a victim is contacted until the completed project.

We have personally dealt with two different networks. The first network was supportive whenever we went to them with questions, but only if we initiated the interaction. They eventually let the contract expire after they determined that our story was not what they wanted. This would have been okay except for the fact that we were notified indirectly and heard from them six months later. While we understand that business works in a certain way, when a network is dealing with a victim of a crime, there should be someone within that organization designated to be the contact person(liaison) for the victim(s).

The second network, Lifetime TV, is still in the process of deciding whether or not to make our movie. Even prior to signing the contract with us, Lifetime worked with us on the issues we were addressing for victims. They went out of their way to support our legislative efforts. Once we had a contract with them, they had someone from their public relations department assigned to us. We were contacted periodically with updates on what was going on and asked if we had any questions or issues with anything to that point. Anytime we made contact with them, they were quick to respond to us with answers to our questions.

My advice to victims would be to contact an entertainment lawyer first so that they can understand the overall process and get assistance with placing a value on their story. There needs to be better communication between the organization and the victim who is selling the story. We feel that it would be very beneficial to a victim if the organization presented an outline that explains the process from beginning to end. The organization should attempt to understand what the victim expects or wants to come about with the movie. In our case, we needed to be assured that it would be factual. Someone needs to sit down with the victim and discuss this facet of the movie and come to a real understanding of the victim's perspective. During this time, the organization could also explain the limitations that exist with regard to making a film. Filmmakers should remember that the crime victim is not just selling the story, they are reliving it throughout the process of making the movie. I cannot stress enough how important two-way communication is to ensure that the victim is not victimized once again.

Another issue that should be addressed by the "well meaning" network is the money. While I do understand that the organization wants and needs to make money, it is unfair that all too often the victim is taken advantage of. The victim is personally invested in the story and this is far more than a simple business transaction. A victim rarely has a proper understanding of the value of the story.

To reiterate, the key to a successful movie from both the victim's and the network’s perspective is open and honest communication. If victims agree to open their hearts and souls for these movies, they need to be able to live with the final outcomes. By including them in the entire process, this can be accomplished.

Back to Top